On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Michael Madigan <[email protected]> wrote: > This is God's practical joke on Richard Dawkins. > > Why does this twit Dawkins waste so much time on a figment of other people's > imagination?
Because in his spirit he knows God to be true, and is in rebellion. The better question is, why is he making children the issue? Well, that can be explained at least partially by Matt 18:3-4;6. Also Matt 19:13-15. - Publius > > > --- On Sat, 11/21/09, Publius Maximus <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Publius Maximus <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OT] Oops >> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> >> Date: Saturday, November 21, 2009, 11:13 PM >> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Pete >> Theisen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Helio Wakasugui wrote: >> >> It doesn't change the fact these two children were >> labeled "christian" by >> >> their parents. >> >> Fortunately for them, neither one was labeled "Helio." >> >> But even if they were, it wouldn't change the fact that >> Dawkins used >> them as "poster children" for humanism, not knowing the >> real reason >> for their obvious freedom and joy. >> >> >> The kids probably believe in god as much they >> believe in >> >> Santa Claus. >> >> Which is to say, 100%. >> >> >> >> >> Those pictures... pretty lame, Calco. >> >> I think I know which one was you. :) >> >> - Publius >> >> > >> >>> Pretty funny. >> > >> >>> On Nov 20, 2009, at 9:54 PM, Publius Maximus >> <[email protected] >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article6925781.ece >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
