On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Jean Laeremans
<[email protected]> wrote:
> You do manage to jump through some weird hoops

It's called independent thinking. You wouldn't understand.

Our new state controlled media has a proven history of focusing on
fluff stories whenever something really consequential is going on.
Right now, that consequential something is the complete implosion of
the myth anthropogenic global warming via CO2, which is getting
virtually no play in our traditional media outlets. However, you
cannot escape the Tiger Woods story, the obvious truth of which,
frankly, is so transparent it's pathetic that they've managed to hype
such a mystery around it.

Why we are being cajoled into caring about Tiger Woods' fender-bender
and marital controversy through gross repetition, and not the series
of massive acts of generational theft, of which Copenhagen is arguably
the most audacious yet perpetrated by the current administration and
its puppet masters in Europe and Asia, should be a point of
consideration for everyone.

- Publius

>
> A+
> jml
>

-- 

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to