Publius Maximus wrote: > http://bit.ly/6LVhOf
> But more dramatic still has been the new evidence from the CRU's > leaked documents, showing just how the evidence was finally rigged. > The most quoted remark in those emails has been one from Prof Jones in > 1999, reporting that he had used "Mike [Mann]'s Nature trick of adding > in the real temps" to "Keith's" graph, in order to "hide the decline". > Invariably this has been quoted out of context. Its true significance, > we can now see, is that what they intended to hide was the awkward > fact that, apart from that one tree, the Yamal data showed > temperatures not having risen in the late 20th century but declining. > What Jones suggested, emulating Mann's procedure for the "hockey > stick" (originally published in Nature), was that tree-ring data after > 1960 should be eliminated, and substituted – without explanation – > with a line based on the quite different data of measured global > temperatures, to convey that temperatures after 1960 had shot up. > > Copenhagen is a complete farce, an act of political & economic ambush. > Just say NO. Hi Bob, Not to worry. They will just allow the Huns to clear-cut all the trees and then we won't have the data conflicts any more. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
