Michael Madigan wrote: > Tiger is only 1/4 Black. If he was all Black he would have cut the heads off > his mistresses.
Hi Michael, The article says he is black enough that certain "Blacks" think he should A: Self-identify as "Black" and B: Not associate with white women, at least not exclusively. Wait, isn't *that* racist? Except, that we shouldn't notice, that is. >> Associated Press headline: >> >> Tiger’s Troubles Widen His Distance From >> Blacks >> >> ‘Two layers of suspicion ... one is the >> pattern in the race of his partners’ >> >> The article that followed labeled the golfer racist not >> only for "declin[ing] to identify himself as black," but also >> because of "the race of the women" he's involved with. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
