On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Michael Madigan <[email protected]> wrote: > Still think he isn't the AntiChrist? He's putting through a abortion funding > bill on Christmas Eve. Now, if you wanted to stick it in the eye of God, > what day would you choose to fund millions of abortions?
To be fair, he wanted to get the federally funded abortion mill operational at full speed back in June. I don't think this was the date he was aiming for. I think God kinda worked that out. Just like how blizzards and deep freezes always manage to happen at global warming conferences. He he he. :) As to his being the Anti-Christ, or not. My position is that he is undoubtedly AN Anti-Christ, that THE Anti-Christ of Revelation was in fact demonstrably Nero -- who was kind of the poster child for the species. There have always been, are, and as we breath in the flesh, always will be false christs and anti-christs. One must be careful which world we're talking about in terms of what prophecies apply, when, and where. IMHO, it is a misreading of Scripture to translate the metaphysical/spiritual reality brought about by the very real (promised, on time, and on budget) destruction of Jerusalem and end of Israel of the old covenant in 70 AD -- the culmination of prophetic Scripture -- into literal meaning today. It's implications are not futuristic except insofar as they are existential, meaning they point to ongoing, never ending reality, the old world having passed away forever. All is fulfilled, Christ reigns in the heavenly realms, and our earthly death has been defeated already, no sequels or epilogues required. Just faith and obedience to the will of God as we work out our salvation with fear and trembling. All of this by way of saying: For all practical purposes, he might as well be THE Anti-Christ, since they all do the same thing when they acquire power. It's kind of like splitting hairs, except to think it's all coming to an end next week or something is almost certainly erroneous and not only leads to false hope but denies the truth of the prophetic scriptures already being fulfilled in terms of what they actually promised (vs. what people fashionably think they promised). Modern evangelical "end times" interpretations are only a hundred or so years old. As such, they're pretty much ingrained in most Christian denominations on some level, implicit in practice or custom, or explicit in doctrine, as the "correct" view, at the moment. But hearty research and a bit of careful exegesis supports my theory too, depending on your hermeneutic. YHMV. This is why stopping people like this matters, regardless. Their evil actions have dire consequences for fairly large chunks of time and on many souls as the dramatic unfolding of history goes on. It's also why, on some level, they cannot be stopped. For God so made the world. If you think women are complicated, wait till you meet God. ;) - Publius > > > --- On Wed, 12/23/09, Publius Maximus <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Publius Maximus <[email protected]> >> Subject: [OT] A Very Barry Christmas! >> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> >> Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2009, 1:01 PM >> http://bit.ly/84d4Uc >> >> - - - >> These photos of ornaments on the White House Christmas tree >> in the >> Blue Room were taken just days ago. Of course, Mao has his >> place in >> the White House. >> >> [image] >> >> And, of course, it wouldn’t be Christmas without an >> ornament of >> legendary transvestite Hedda Lettuce. >> >> [images] >> >> And, so soon after collecting the Nobel Peace Prize, why >> wouldn’t the >> White House have an ornament super-imposing President Obama >> onto Mt. >> Rushmore... >> >> [image] >> - - - >> >> Glad El Presidente has not lost track of the "reason for >> the season".... >> >> - Publius >> >> -- >> >> "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this >> country, >> under an efficient government, will probably be an >> increasing object >> of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that >> enterprises to >> subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of >> foreign >> powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted >> by some of >> them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can >> be >> avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but >> those whose >> situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the >> faithful >> and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers >> #59] >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
