At 12:36 AM 1/1/2010 -0500, Publius Maximus wrote:
>http://bit.ly/6WtTLv
...
>and
>
>http://bit.ly/5M4Iip
...

In this whole mess, if we really want to make intelligent decisions, we 
need to examine all facts. And unfortunately, those facts are becoming very 
hard to get to. We've let too many people get by with very shoddy 
"scientific" papers. We have to face that and understand it. Yes, the 
leaked emails imply (if not outright state) GW data was doctored in certain 
papers. Yes we've seen a lot of the GW "foundation" papers come to light as 
having flawed reasoning, etc. Yes we have global measurements of the 
general average of the overall planet's temperature and the trend seems to 
be rising. Yes there is BIG MONEY involved in studying climate change. That 
last point is probably the single most detrimental barrier to getting to 
the truth. It seems science is no longer about truth, it's for sale to the 
highest bidder. Right now, the GW advocates are paying top dollar.

One thing is pretty sure - any "study" that is published from ANYWHERE 
needs to be received with quite a bit of skepticism. The first step would 
be to find out who funded the study. The next would be to look at the 
provided raw data. Yep, raw data. I know that doesn't sound appealing to a 
lot of folks... it's easier to just say "The experts said this data means 
xyz." But that just means you're easy prey for manipulation (from either 
side of an argument). If you really want to improve "scientific" reports, 
praise and support those that provide real data (that can be verified 
independently). And for those reports that don't give their data, deride 
them, make fun of them, but for goodness sake never put faith in them.

It truly is a sad story that things have come to this. I suppose it's to be 
expected. Every other endeavor man has performed eventually becomes subject 
to his depravity. With no ultimate sense of right and wrong, why would 
anyone feel guilty about falsifying data to prove their point... they just 
do what they have to for the money.

-Charlie


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to