Hi James

In the UK we use an adapter which is called a "MOD-TAP" or Line Adapter
which I used to get from a company called Molex.
These are RJ45 plug to BT line socket adapters.

I think you need to look further using the above product types or
Manufacturer/Supplier as they need to have American telephone sockets
obviously.

I seem to remember that the CAT5/6 cabling had to have all wires
connected and correct for them to work.

In the UK they come in two type - Master (with ringing capacitor) and
secondary (without).
At least two of the medium sized companies I do maintenance for, use
them without problems.

Cheers

Peter
Peter Hart Computers.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of James E Harvey
Sent: 11 January 2010 19:45
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: [NF] ethernet to telephone wire and back

Is there a such thing as a "balun" that will allow a connection from
ethernet to telephone wires back to ethernet cable.

Our maintenance shop is about 1,000 feet from the office and we want to
connect the foreman's computer to our server.  We know there are open
telephone wires available if this can be done.

My Google search "ethernet to telephone baluns" isn't coming up with
anything specific.


James E Harvey
Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc.
M.I.S./Corresponding Officer
Off: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766
email: [email protected]


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/a57fa4cf19531343a2ee11b57db8e3af100...@server.peterhartcomputers.local
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to