And by the way how does Robertson's statements absolve Rev. Glover of his theosophical pronouncements about Mother Earth's "retribution" for Copenhagen?
It just proves that Global Warming is indeed a religion, and its adherents are just as likely to make ridiculous hypocritical statements. - Publius On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> wrote: > Pat Robertson is a religious nut. The only difference between him and the > jihadists is he is not actually strapping on bombs and going out to kill. > > If you do believe in God, then take heart that the Bible says he will never > destroy again after wiping out Sodom and Gomorrah. So where does that leave > Robertson? Who would be then responsible for the Haiti earthquake? I say it > is a random, natural event that we have no control over. Prayer or otherwise > will have no effect on these events either before or after. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Publius Maximus" <[email protected]> > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 11:29 AM > Subject: [OT] Glover: Haiti is punishment for Copenhagen failure > > >> http://bit.ly/5YnuzH >> >> - - - >> >> OK, at least Pat Robertson's rather, shall we say, "controversial" >> argument about God being miffed with the Haitians for making a pact >> with the Devil was arguably somehow relatable to the catastrophe at >> hand. >> >> Why on earth, pray tell, would Gaia punish Haiti for Copenhagen's >> failure with an earthquake? Wouldn't a category 15 hurricane hitting, >> say, Denmark be more in line with Global Warming theosophical >> principles? >> >> (I note instead they got a blizzard, right there at the conference. A >> clue, for those with eyes to see...) >> >> - Publius >> >> -- >> >> "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, >> under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object >> of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to >> subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign >> powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of >> them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be >> avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose >> situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful >> and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
