Publius Maximus wrote:

>> http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-mass-senate20-2010jan20,1,2469751.story
>>
>> The duck is now lame.
> 
> I disagree. Now his agenda has been rejected (even 56% of
> Massachusetts voters yesterday indicated ObamaCare was the main reason
> for their vote!)... a process that will be complete in November.
> 
> This is the moment I've been waiting to see whether I am right or
> wrong about him on the deepest levels of my critique. He's now been
> pretty openly rejected---even by his own.
> 
> If I'm wrong, he'll make a huge push to the center, and maybe even cut
> some taxes that matter for job creation, etc., and embrace Republican
> participation and openness etc. He'll stop demonizing people and
> mocking his opponents. He'll give interviews, yea, even to Fox. He'll
> hire some czars and czarinas who don't think Mao is the best
> philosopher they can quote. He'll abandon the current health care bill
> and start afresh the way he promised to. He'll drop cap'n'trade and
> amnesty for illegals nonsense at least until the economy recovers, and
> reverse course on providing civil trials for terrorists.

Hi Bob,

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703405704575015571791474224.html

How's this:

"President Obama said he would be open to scaling back the legislation 
in order to salvage it. "I would advise that we try to move quickly to 
coalesce around those elements in the package that people agree on,""
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to