http://bit.ly/7CjGIA

- - -
Now that people are paying attention, the Astroturfers are coming out
of the woodwork:

Jan Chen of Seattle writes to the Northwest Asian Weekly (a small
Asian paper serving the Seattle area):

As one listens to the Republican anger over health care reform, one
can imagine an anti-government protester cheerfully paying premiums on
insurance policies that drop you after you make a claim, or happily
sauntering out of an emergency room that denied them treatment because
of a coverage problem. One can imagine a town hall sign-waver
enthusiastically forking over most of their pay to bill collectors
after suffering a catastrophic injury, thinking, “Wow, the free market
system is great.”

Meanwhile, Gloria Elle writes to the Baltimore Chronicle — on the same
page as Mark Spivey and Ellie Light:

As one listens to the Republican anger over health care reform, one
can imagine an anti-government protester cheerfully paying premiums on
insurance policies that cancel you for making a claim, or happily
sauntering out of an emergency room that denied them treatment because
of a coverage problem. One can imagine a town-hall sign-waver
enthusiastically forking over most of their pay to bill collectors
after suffering a catastrophic injury, thinking, “Wow, the free market
system is great.”

Jan Chen and Gloria Elle certainly have a similar writing style, don’t they?

To the word. Thanks to liberrocky on Twitter for the find.

Freepers discovered another one: Janet Leigh. (Cute.) This one is
explained here. [UPDATE: To make it clear and explicit, the link shows
that the very same pro-Obama letter was written by Janet Leigh to
NewburgGraphic.com, and by Earnest Gardner to the Memphis Flyer. She
also finds Janet Leigh next to Mark Spivey in the Santa Barbara
Independent.]

The story is exploding. There is Astroturf everywhere.

Go find some yourself. Just take phrases from suspicious-looking
letters and put the phrases into Google and see what you find. Then
report back here.

UPDATE: Liberrocky found another one: Jen Park and Lars Deerman
writing the same letter to different publications. Lars Deerman writes
to the Deccan Herald:

I hear the Obama Administration talk of getting a health bill passed
by compromise.

Maybe the so-called public option can be used as a bargaining chip to
bring the Republicans to the table.

So what do the Republicans say? That Obama is not a U.S. citizen, and
has no right to be President, that his plans are Socialist and contain
death panels.They hope the Obama Presidency fails.

I cannot think of a single nice thing that a Republican Congress
member has ever said about Obama or his plans. Not one. Can you? Where
does Obama get the idea that Republicans want to work with him? They
clearly don’t want to.

Lars Deerman

And Jen Park writes at the Baltimore Chronicle:

I hear the Obama Administration talk of getting a health bill passed
by compromise. Maybe the so-called public option can be used as a
bargaining chip to bring The Republicans to the table. So what do the
Republicans say? That Obama is not a U.S. citizen, and has no right to
be President, that his plans are socialist and contain death panels,
and that they hope the Obama Presidency fails. I cannot think of a
single nice thing that a Republican congressmember has ever said about
Obama or his plans. Not a one. Can you? Where does Obama get the idea
that Republicans want to work with him? They clearly don’t want to.

This is the very same Baltimore Chronicle page with letters from Ellie
Light and Mark Spivey.

Oh — and there’s also one from Lars Deerman.

Can we get a Big Media investigation yet? Anyone want to tell the
Baltimore Chronicle that its “representative letters” page is filled
with garbage from Astroturfers?

UPDATE x2: Another pairing: Jen Park and John F. Scott.

Jen Park writes in The Source Weekly:

So let’s get this straight. Obama’s predecessor took America to war
under false pretense, citing “weapons of mass destruction” that
everyone agrees did not exist, and today’s Republicans don’t want
Obama addressing children because of “indoctrination?”

Our previous president preached war against Iraq to anyone who would
listen, children, adults, young and old, making us partners in his
blunder, and the Republicans dare talk of keeping their children safe
from Obama’s ideas? What are Obama’s ideas? That the government can be
an active partner in change, rather than a nuisance? And this notion
is suppose to be bad?

The Republican Party seems determined to be “against” everything Democratic.

And at our favorite Baltimore Chronicle letters page, John F. Scott writes:

So let’s get this straight. Obama’s predecessor took America to war
under false pretense, citing “weapons of mass destruction” that
everyone agrees did not exist, and today’s Republicans don’t want
Obama addressing children because of “indoctrination?” Our previous
president preached war against Iraq to anyone who would listen,
children, adults, young and old, making us partners in his blunder,
and the Republicans dare talk of keeping their children safe from
Obama’s ideas? What are Obama’s ideas? That the government can be an
active partner in change, rather than a nuisance. And this notion is
suppose to be bad? The Republican Party seems determined to be
“against” everything Democratic.
- - -

This has now unofficially reached the status of an outrage, and may
soon become a scandal.

Well, except for the fact we obviously no longer have an independent press.

- Publius

-- 

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to