http://bit.ly/dotxoJ

- - -
NEW ORLEANS -- Four days before James O'Keefe was charged in a plot to
tamper with the office phones of Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu, the
conservative activist promised his audience at a luncheon they would
be hearing about a project he was working on in New Orleans.

O'Keefe wouldn't elaborate on the nature of his plans, according to
people who heard his speech at the luncheon held by the conservative
Pelican Institute last Thursday in New Orleans.

...

Michael Madigan, O'Keefe's lawyer, said Wednesday that his client was
not trying to wiretap or interfere with Landrieu's phones, but he
would not explain why O'Keefe was there. He also would not say whether
O'Keefe was working for someone or was on his own.

"The truth will come out," said Madigan, a Washington lawyer who
represented Sen. Howard Baker, the Republican who famously asked
during the Watergate investigation, "What did the President know and
when did he know it?"
- - -

And I thought Michael Madigan was just a humble FoxPro programmer who
sold conservative T-Shirts on the side!  ;-)

On a serious note, I doubt O'Keefe was trying to tap any lines, but it
was a stupid risk anyway, even if all he was trying to do -- as has
been speculated -- was prove the Senator was ignoring constituent
phone calls by simply shutting them off. Early success tends to go to
the head, especially for young guys like O'Keefe. Dumb, in any case,
whatever the reason he concocted to pose as a telephone operator and
enter a government office under false pretense.

Rest assured, if there is any way they can have him thrown in the
slammer they will do it. He did what no journalist in America dared to
do -- expose ACORN for the criminal goon operation that it is.

- Publius
-- 

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to