On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Bill Arnold <[email protected]> wrote: > Bob, > >> And the truth Bill is you simply hate freedom of speech for people who >> come from different perspective, and view life's "resources" as >> altogether too few to allow it for people you deem "uncreative." The >> cognitive dissonance between, on the one hand, your eager anticipation >> of a free internet in, say, China, and panting for regulation and >> control over "annoying" voices here on this list, on the other, is... >> well, simply delicious! > > I don't think you missed my point at all, you just enjoy head games, which I > do not.
Yea, it's called "thinking." Give it a whirl sometime, you might enjoy it. > >> From a guy biochemically incapable of finding humor, valid points, or >> even humanity in anyone with a view not oriented around the things you >> think is important, that is a very rich question. > > I'm now one of 40% of the ProFox list, that's 145 people, who are not > interested in what OT has degenerated to. > > It is exactly a sense of humanity that drove me to write as I did, LOL! I miss you, Bill, this was classic Arnoldicity, I forgot how selfless and altruistic and honest and gosh darn humble you are! > because I > know the horror the warmongers and their supporters have wrought on at least > a million innocent people - and it ain't over! - and I see that same gang > robbed us blind and put our children into such debt they will never enjoy > what could have been. Wait till the new gang is done! They will make the previous one look like a bunch of pikers. Indeed, they already spent more on one monstrous political payback bill (the so-called "stimulus") than it took to liberate Iraq... and that was just the prelude to the appetizer. > I didn't accomplish anything because I was blocked at > every turn by propagandists, hecklers and head-game players, No, you didn't accomplish anything because your arguments sucked. > > Here, Bob, take on a real challenge and see how you many ways you can spin > this http://www.thenation.com/doc/20100222/lessig I tried to peruse it quickly but it was as rambling and stream-of-consciousness as one of your missives. I'll read it analytically after dinner and see if I can help you make contact with reality. You're right: It's a real challenge, all right, given both the source (The Nation) and the destination (your cranium) in this case, but I'll do my best. ;) - Publius -- "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
