On of the comments to that article hit it on the head. Consensus has nothing to do with AGW's scientific validity: it's about reproducibility. Missing data invalidates the conclusion, period, unless some other studies can reproduce the same results.
- Publius On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Michael Madigan <[email protected]> wrote: > Arrest these people. > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
