Dear Ted: Thank you. I had been editing with NVU. I think I'll try now Kompozer/ I like the tidy up link in validator.w3.org Ted Roche wrote: Well, Charles, the real problem is that the page is not a valid html <[email protected]> wrote: You expect a recent release of a standards compliant browser to render <[email protected] wrote: http://homepages.uc.edu/~enzerch/reviews/past_sel.html http://TinyURL.com/EnzerMD [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Differing Rendering FireFox and IExplorer
Charles Hart Enzer, M.D., FAACP Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:39:53 -0700
- [NF] Differing Rendering FireFox and IExpl... Charles Hart Enzer, M.D., FAACP
- Re: [NF] Differing Rendering FireFox ... Paul McNett
- Re: [NF] Differing Rendering Fire... Ted Roche
- Re: [NF] Differing Rendering ... Charles Hart Enzer, M.D., FAACP

