Jeff Johnson wrote on 2010-03-25: > On 3/24/2010 2:39 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: >> On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:33 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: >> >>> Stephen, >>> Could you do me and all of us a favor, and when you reply to a >>> message try to leave the original message intact, and put your >>> reply at the top. It is difficult sometimes to figure out the >>> sequence of messages and what is being discussed when the replys >>> are out of order, or the original message is missing. >>> Thanks, >>> Ron C >>> >>> So much for trimming to save bandwidth! >> >> Next time you write a report, make sure to put all the paragraphs > and sections in reverse order in order to make it easier for him to > read. >> >> Microsoft has screwed up a lot of what they've touched on the > internet, but the way they've hosed email by establishing top posting > and no trimming as a de facto standard is probably the most annoying. >> >> >> >> -- Ed Leafe >> > > Funny, I can't find the original post so I have no idea what the > boss's strange request was. I searched the archives and this thread > isn't in there. > > Jeff >
Jeff, He wants it to be the default Outlook way. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/002001cacc58$eea9bc50$cbfd34...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
