Allen wrote: > I hated dreamweaver. I used frontpage 2003 and still do for some things. but > the free visual studio web is good enough and can do apps as well
DreamWeaver is designed for artistic types, like ad agency people. As a race, programmers are (um -- how can I say this) "not known for their aesthetic sensibilities." (Though I'm sure *you* are an exception! That is a *really* nice pocket protector! Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.) I teach DreamWeaver, and technical people commonly struggle with it because they always want to dig into the code directly. Artistic types also struggle with it, as they are used to print media, and can't stand the idea that 10 users will each see the web site differently, depending on their monitor, browser, etc. They also can't stand the limitations of HTML and CSS -- the idea for example that this logo can't be *exactly* in this position & size. Ken _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
