Not 100% true. Conservative judges like Souter and Stevens sometimes turn Liberal, but Liberal judges never turn Conservative.
Do you think that bug-faced Ginsburg would ever rule on the Conservative side? --- On Thu, 4/15/10, Stephen Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Stephen Russell <[email protected]> > Subject: [OT] Letter to the Editor today > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010, 1:09 PM > I like how concise this is. > > Let me offer an efficient analysis of the upcoming process > of > replacing Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens (April 10 > article): > > A politician will nominate a politician who will be > confirmed by > politicians. The stage-crafted Senate hearings will > include > self-serving, ignorance, deception and bitterness. Somehow > race or > gender or both will provoke controversy. The delicate > matter of > abortion will be oversimplified and bludgeoned. Cable news > and talk > radio will see an uptick in their ratings. > > In the end, to resolve the critical legal issues of our > time, > Americans will still depend on nine persons whose decisions > can be > predicted before they ever hear the cases. > > > -- > Stephen Russell > > Sr. Production Systems Programmer > CIMSgts > > 901.246-0159 cell > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
