Nicholas Geti wrote: > Don't you realize that for every worker in the U.S. there must be 100 people > on this planet who can replace you for $5.00 per day? There are some > barriers but they keep falling every year. > > I still say the world's people must figure out how to reduce the population. > The only way in the past is by war or disease. There must be a better way.
Hi Nicholas, Perhaps even less than $5 in some places. Reducing the population probably isn't going to happen except by war and disease in the foreseeable future (and might be counterproductive, depending on how effective war and disease are), but not to worry. There are always wars, a number of wars in progress as we consider this topic, and disease is also non-stop. Some disease is even ineptly caused by doctors. Prosperity tends to reduce the birth rate. As a people prosper they have fewer children in their whole population. The really down and out nations don't have widespread knowledge of birth control. It is a shame to say it, but there are also murders and accidents. Combined with war and disease the death rate is 100%. After the war between the states the southern states had an underpopulation problem for years. Could happen again if the terrorists get the weapons they want. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
