> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Ed Leafe > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 11:29 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ADMIN] is ProFox search broken? > > It's working fine, as far as I can tell. If you search by words, > there is a minimum length of 4 characters per word; smaller words aren't > indexed. Also, by default, [NF] and [OT] messages are not included; you > have to check those options. > > Can you tell me what you were searching by?
You're right - it's fine.... I was unaware of the 4 char minimun, thus my search for "HL7" didn't work, and I just started working backwards on the letters trying to make the search kick something out... Thanks, Matthew Jarvis || Business Systems Analyst IT Department McKenzie-Willamette Medical Center 1460 G Street, Springfield, OR 97477 || Ph: 541-744-6092 || Fax: 541-744-6145 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain information that is Proprietary, Confidential, or legally privileged or protected. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and entity named in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message and do not disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information it contains. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/69f310c05dd83c48a84ba3769ce1ecf8032fb...@tntriexevs02.triadhospitals.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
