Ed Leafe wrote: >> Makes you wonder how thin/trim >> VFP would be today if it only supported back to say VFP8. > > > Really? How much VFP 9 work do you do that needs to support @SAY/GET? > VFP should have done this when it made the jump from 2.x to 3.0. Instead, > they simply layered the OO stuff on top of the existing 2.x code.
None...that's my point. I wonder how much leaner it would have been. > > Fox 2.x will continue to run on systems of that era. Imagine if Fox > could have dumped that baggage and evolved to take advantage of improvements > in hardware and the OS. It would be interesting!!! -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
