On 6/16/10 8:26 PM, Rick Schummer wrote: >>> Code from VFP8 to VFP9<< > > So many versions, only so many brain cells. One thing I do remember getting > burned bad was a situation where we inherited an app that had a local view > based on a remote view. I have always stayed away from view-on-views. The > behavior in older versions of VFP is if you requery the second view, it > automatically requeried the first view. That behavior changed along the way. > So now you have to requery the underlying view(s) before you requery the > outermost view.
I got burned by remote views, period, in VFP6 or 7. I don't remember the details, but I switched to making updateable spt cursors (don't require a DBC) and never looked back. Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
