Thanks for info, Rick. I was almost sure that's the case, but not 100% though :)
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:profoxtech- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rick Schummer > Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 8:48 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Calling parent classes method with same name (for sake of > consistency in interface) > > >> I don't have VFP installed so I can't check, but I _think_ the scope > resolution operator (::) is more flexible than DoDefault(), though, because it > allows you to call a different method than the one you're in. Such as call > MyOriginal::SomeMethod from MyChild:AddRecord.<< > > Scope resolution operator also allows you to pick any class in the hierarchy, > not just the one directly above it. > > Rick > White Light Computing, Inc. > > www.whitelightcomputing.com > www.swfox.net > www.rickschummer.com > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
