http://bit.ly/9iRJZ8

- - -
What one finds when reading congressional legislation is invariably
surprising. Take the Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill, for
instance, which was created by merging Senate and House bills. When
the Senate returns from recess one of its first actions will be to
vote on the bill, which passed the House on June 30.

I was searching the bill for a provision about derivatives. What did I
find but Section 342, which declares that race and gender employment
ratios, if not quotas, must be observed by private financial
institutions that do business with the government. In a major power
grab, the new law inserts race and gender quotas into America's
financial industry.

In addition to this bill's well-publicized plans to establish over a
dozen new financial regulatory offices, Section 342 sets up at least
20 Offices of Minority and Women Inclusion. This has had no coverage
by the news media and has large implications.

...

If the director decides that a contractor has not made a good-faith
effort to include women and minorities in its workforce, he is
required to contact the agency administrator and recommend that the
contractor be terminated.

Section 342's provisions are broad and vague, and are certain to
increase inefficiency in federal agencies. To comply, federal agencies
are likely to find it easier to employ and contract with
less-qualified women and minorities, merely in order to avoid
regulatory trouble. This would in turn decrease the agencies'
efficiency, productivity and output, while increasing their costs.

...

The new Offices of Women and Minorities represent a major change in
employment law by imposing gender and racial quotas on the financial
industry. The issue deserves careful debate - rather than a few pages
slipped into the financial regulation bill.
- - -

What a clusterfark. It's bad enough we have a Muslim-raised
half-Kenyan, adopted-Indonesian man-child for president, in a sad
twist of fate we also have the Banking Queen rewriting our financial
regulatory system at the same time.

What could go wrong?

Besides everything, I mean.

- Publius

-- 

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to