Unfortunately the American people have been dumbed-down for so many years, they just don't understand the seriousness of the problem.
--- On Thu, 7/8/10, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OT] Heckuva job, Barry > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 4:47 PM > I do agree with your sentiments in > this message. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Publius Maximus" <[email protected]> > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 3:23 PM > Subject: [OT] Heckuva job, Barry > > > > http://bit.ly/dzqCgs > > > > - - - > > > > June 30, 2010... 1-DAY deficit: $166 B. Average > MONTHLY deficit since > > Barry took the Oval Orifice: $260B. > > > > Average ANNUAL deficit under 8 years of Bush & the > Evil Republicans > > (2001-2006, before the Democrats took over in 2007): > $108 B. And that, > > with a terrorist attack and war going on. > > > > If I hear one more pin-head talk about the $1 T spent > on the war in > > the last 9 years, compared to the ~$2T annual deficits > Barry & the > > Dimocrats are wracking up and projecting for the next > ten years on all > > their social experiments -- all the while blaming Bush > for their > > totally, utterly, completely reckless go-for-bust > fiscal policies -- > > I'm probably going to glock them. It's just not a > credible excuse > > anymore. > > > > For crying out loud even the bankrupt European > socialists are balking > > at the kind of deficit spending and Barry seems > altogether too gleeful > > to carry on (and raise taxes insanely to support). > > > > The. Insanity. Must. Stop. > > > > - Publius > > > > -- > > > > "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of > this country, > > under an efficient government, will probably be an > increasing object > > of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and > that enterprises to > > subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues > of foreign > > powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and > abetted by some of > > them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case > that can be > > avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any > but those whose > > situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest > in the faithful > > and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist > Papers #59] > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
