Michael Madigan wrote:
> All Government subsidies should end for everything.  Enough.
> 
> http://www.slate.com/id/2262229/pagenum/all/

Hi Michael,

"The poor you have always with you", somebody so politically incorrect 
He was crucified once said. So it is OK now to let "them" starve to 
death for a few years until (ha) the budget gets balanced? Like it ever 
will . . .

Seems we started doing that in the Clinton years while we ended "welfare 
as we know it". Then the budget balanced for a minute but we kept on 
doing it. Now there is a deficit. Oh, surplus/deficit is unrelated to 
charity? Could be . . .

But they aren't starving, you could say. The food bank gives each 
diabetic two or even three loaves of bread, two packages of pasta, a 
cake and a twelve pack of HFCS soda - all things that diabetics 
shouldn't have, every week. Do I have to say that nearly all the poor, 
certainly the aged poor, are diabetic? That is worse than starving, it 
is being poisoned. It is the only food they have, so they eat it, and it 
makes them sicker and sicker.

The subsidy isn't the problem, it is wrong subsidies. Wrong to give 
hungry sick people the kind of food they shouldn't have, wrong to give 
anything to persons who are not in need.

Yes, nearly all the government spending is "funneled" through the rich - 
but most of it stops with them. Sure, they "create" a few jobs - in 
India - or here for illegals.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to