On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:23 PM, G Gambill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looking for suggestions for an encryption routine for VFP 6. Â Encryption at > the field level is good enough. > > I have a home grown routine but am looking for more sophistication. > It's worthwhile considering upgrading from VFP6 to 9. There's improved stability and performance. If you can't, you might get Craig's encryption routines to work with VF6. If not, take a look at this reimplementation of Tom Rettig's cipher routines in pure VFP: http://www.berezniker.com/content/pages/visual-foxpro/vfp-implementation-cipher-encryption It's slow to use on a lot of fields and not highly secure but suitable for a few fields and to deter the lazy. Also, do consider some of the points raised here: http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~DataEncryption -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
