And I finally pretty much agree with you. Works come out of salvation but
are not what defines it. I am aware of the passages you wrote and I contend
that neither affects salvation by grace alone - which was the actual topic.
Just please keep in mind that most people (almost everyone actually) submits
their beliefs in a thread like this without putting up a treatise on every
aspect or issue related to it. You don't need to suggest that I don't know
the topic exceptionally well because I don't put up a 15,000 word
dissertation on it. Salvation is by faith alone and yes IT IS THAT SIMPLE.

Geoff Flight
General Manager

Sustainable Resources Industry Training Pty Ltd
58 Norrie Ave
Clovelly Park 5042
P: +61 8 8277 6380 M: 0414 965 226 F: +61 8 8177 1290  W: www.srit.com.au E:
[email protected]
TAKE THE SURVEY! http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/976V5JT


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Publius Maximus
Sent: Monday, 8 November 2010 5:56 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] On christian mythology

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:38 AM, geoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> You just asked one of the central questions of the Reformation - and got
it
> wrong. Salvation is by faith alone - not of works (eph 2: 8,9). And it
> really IS that clear.

True: salvation is by faith alone, and grace is sufficient. Works are,
however, the outward manifestation of that salvation, rooted in the
case of a truly saved person in love, such that if there are none, or
a man's works contradict his faith, he needs to check his faith. And
by logical extension, his salvation.

Works don't save you, but a man who does no good works, or does them
out of anything but love (e.g., some people do good works out of fear
of damnation), is probably not saved, because he has not really
accepted and internalized that grace.

Or did you skip over the parts that say, e.g., "Faith without works is
dead" (James 2:20) and "If a man says he loves God, but hates his
brother, the same is a liar, and there is no truth in him" (1 John
4:20)?

The proposition may be "that simple" but its implications are profound
and by no means "simplistic."

- Publius

> Geoff Flight
> General Manager
>
> Sustainable Resources Industry Training Pty Ltd
>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to