Yes, it's personal responsibility and personal choices. I live in a tiny house, I drive an old car, my girlfriend drives an old car, we didn't go on vacation this year, we sold some stuff I didn't want to sell but I had to. Personal responsibility and choices.
--- On Thu, 11/11/10, geoff <[email protected]> wrote: > From: geoff <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [OT] Serious legal challenges to Health Bill > To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010, 5:20 PM > Why don't you tell pete about his > lack of personal responsibility then? He > isn't getting the health care he needs. > > What amazes me is that you claim to be a Christian yet your > compassion for > others is way way below the most ardent atheist on this > list. In fact I > would call you compassion-less. > > When we have already had one member on this list DIE > because she couldn't > afford the outrageous prices of medication in USA can you > really say it was > a 'personal responsibility' issue? > > Geoff Flight > General Manager > > Sustainable Resources Industry Training Pty Ltd > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf > Of Michael Madigan > Sent: Friday, 12 November 2010 8:45 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: RE: [OT] Serious legal challenges to Health Bill > > I'm sorry, I guess personal responsibility isn't one of > your virtues. > > --- On Thu, 11/11/10, geoff <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From: geoff <[email protected]> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Serious legal challenges to Health > Bill > > To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> > > Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010, 5:14 PM > > The question is breathtaking in the > > way it indicates complete disregard for > > others. > > I expect little more from madagain > > > > Geoff Flight > > General Manager > > > > Sustainable Resources Industry Training Pty Ltd > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > On Behalf > > Of Pete Theisen > > Sent: Friday, 12 November 2010 8:29 AM > > To: ProFox Email List > > Subject: Re: [OT] Serious legal challenges to Health > Bill > > > > Michael Madigan wrote: > > > Why do people have kids if they can't afford > them? > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > The poor value children and family - and they believe > in > > the idea of > > immortal souls. They are already starving so one more > > starving person is > > actually no change to them. They just throw another > handful > > of beans and > > another handful of rice into the pot, with some more > water. > > They already > > have the clothes that the older one grew out of. > > > > Relief benefits are per person, not per couple. So > another > > child will > > increase the benefit. If it did not, the poor will > still > > have more > > children, it never occurs to them not to. "Birth > Control" > > is a middle > > and upper class habit. > > > > >>> They can pay Social Security without > getting > > free > > >> health care. > > > > >> True, but more will survive to adulthood if > they > > get health > > >> care. They > > >> certainly won't be able to get it unless it > is > > free - they > > >> are paid next > > >> to nothing. > > >> > > >>>>> And why should a family have a > litter > > of kids > > >> with > > >>>> free health care? > > >>>> Because they are Catholic? Never mind > that > > YOUR > > >> Social > > >>>> Security is based > > >>>> on the taxes levied on the next > > generation's > > >> productivity. > > >>>> Don't say you > > >>>> won't need Social Security. Become > > disabled in a > > >> down > > >>>> market and you > > >>>> WILL need Social Security. > > >>>> > > >>>>>> Yeah. Even the Bible has > nothing > > to > > >>>>>> say about health care being > a > > basic > > >>>>>> right. Actually it doesn't > say > > anything > > >> about > > >>>> wealth being > > >>>>>> a basic right > > >>>>>> either. It just says the > wealthy > > should > > >> help the > > >>>> poor; not > > >>>>>> to bring them up > > >> -- > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Pete > > >> http://pete-theisen.com/ > > >> http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ > > >> > [excessive quoting removed by server] > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
