Jeff Johnson wrote: > Pete: I think that even the Wizard of Leafe would agree that "Thank > You" is never [OT]!
Hi Jeff, Oh, I have posted a thanks before and had it criticized for a forgotten [OT]. Of course, what I was thanking about had been something unrelated or tenuously related to tech. I wonder if I can find that old "Holiday Gift" post from several Christmases ago . . . http://leafe.com/archives/msg/173782 :-) >> Allen wrote: >>> Same here, well not so much Dabo as I don't use it but still I wish well >> I agree that thanks are appropriate, and hasten to add my appreciation >> of [OT] - looking over my shoulder that some second-guesser may say that >> this message should have been so flagged, LOL. >> >> :-) >> >>> Merry Christmas to all and here is wishing you a great 2011! I am very >>> thankful for all of your help! I *REALLY* appreciate it! >>> >>> And a special "thank you" for Ed! That's for keeping the ProFox family >>> of lists alive! >>> >>> And another "thank you" for Ed and Paul, and all of the contributors for >>> giving birth to, and raising Dabo! -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
