I think he's referring to the "hype" factor. John
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 12:01 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] And in other FUD news, On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Paul McNett <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/17/11 4:44 AM, Ted Roche wrote: >> I've heard the IIS 7 was a major re-write, so perhaps they have >> improved things. Perhaps. > > Whenever I hear "this next great version is a major rewrite", I shudder. --------------- LOL How are you you so holy that your customers never what significant changes to one of your existing systems? Or are you in forever tweak mode and everything is in a state of flux forever? When I go through a major # version change there had better be something worthy to my customer and myself. I expect refactoring of portions of older code and taking advantage of fresh modern technology if it benefits the system. That is what I think of for a Major Version change. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer CIMSgts 901.246-0159 cell [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
