Change your filter to between 13 and 22 instead of less than 23?

--
rk


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Rafael Copquin
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 7:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: top clause in sql Server

I have a legacy vfp 6 database that I am migrating to SQL Server 2008.

The items table has a field named "itemcode" with a character field type of 
width 6

This field would suposedly contain alphanumeric codes, but the client always 
used numeric codes, starting in '1' and ending in '999999'

I migrated the data to a SQL Server table, making the itemcode field of type 
char(6) not null.

Now I want to bring a limited number of records from this table, to show in a 
VFP grid. Because the grid can only show 20 records at a time, I developed a 
pagination routine that only brings 20 records at a time, when the user presses 
the next page or the previous page buttons on the form.

My problem is with the previous page routine. My statement is:

Text to cCmd textmerge noshow flags 2 pretext 15

select top 20 itemcode,(some more records) from silver.dbo.items where itemcode 
< 23 order by itemcode desc

endtext

SQLExec(thisform.nHandle,cCmd,'curItems')

The cursor curItems brings the correct list of items (13 to 22) but ordered 
from 22 to 13. Since I want them to be ordered like: 13 to 22, I change the 
order by clause as: order by itemcode asc.

But I get records 1 to 10, and I want 13 to 22.

I am aware that I can live with curItems the way SQL Server generates it and 
then simply issue:
select curItems
index on itemcode tag itemcode

or alternatively

select * from curItems into cursor curAnotherCursor order by itemcode

But I do not want to have a VFP index in this cursor or have to create another 
cursor from the obtained recordset.  I just want to get the cursor directly 
from SQL Server, ordered from 13 to 22.

Any suggestions?

Rafael Copquin


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DF1EEF11E586A64FB54A97F22A8BD0441922355368@ACKBWDDQH1.artfact.local
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to