On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Dan Covill wrote:

> I'm with Al.  I try to top-post, unless the context is really critical.
> Has top-posting been declared evil?


        Dan, you're a young'un, so you probably don't remember the days before 
Outlook. :)

        Besides making things hard to read, it encourages people to not trim 
their replies. Observe any thread dominated by top posters, and you'll see 
reams and reams of useless quoted garbage below any actual useful content.

        Most people who top-post do so because they use an email client that 
defaults to that style. They click 'Reply', type a few words, and hit send. No 
thought is given to composition, much less trimming.

        The ideal method of replying is inline comments, with trimming off all 
the non-relevant quoted text. That way you have sufficient context to 
understand what the writer is responding to, and are also able to read it in a 
much more conversational style.



-- Ed Leafe




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to