> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Ted Roche
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 11:32 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Java versions
> 
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Jarvis, Matthew <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Is there a way around this or a way to isolate Java uniquely to
> > different software installations?
> >
> 
>
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/271609/multiple-java-versions-running
-
> concurrently-under-windows
> 
> --
> Ted Roche

Thanks Ted...

Ironically none of this seems to apply to the situation that exists on
the first machine I looked at w/ the problem...

BUT it's good to know about these techniques for another instance...
 
Matthew Jarvis || Business Systems Analyst
IT Department
McKenzie-Willamette Medical Center
1460 G Street, Springfield, OR  97477 || Ph: 541-744-6092 || Fax:
541-744-6145
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain information that is
Proprietary, Confidential, or legally privileged or protected. It
is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and entity named
in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy
this message and do not disclose its contents or take any action in
reliance on the information it contains.

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/69f310c05dd83c48a84ba3769ce1ecf804631...@tntriexevs02.triadhospitals.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to