>> What's the current guidelines on where a VFP executable should be installed, 
>> and where should the data be stored?<<

I have installed apps on Vista and Windows 7 in Program Files with absolutely 
no problems. I'm lucky, most of my apps
get installed on the server so this whole programming files folder question is 
kind of a non-issue. We install on shares
on the server. On client OSes, and with few exceptions, I am only installing 
read-only files in the app folder if they
are stored in under Program Files. You can also set the administrative rights 
to subfolders to read-write and most
installers have tools to help you do that.  This way you can still have your 
data avoid the virtualization.

The thing I like about Program Files folder is that is where most people expect 
to find the application. Easier for IT
departments to set up shortcuts when they are helping the users out who deleted 
the one optionally installed for them.
Saves them support time for them to locate the folder.

I personally find apps automatically writing a new subfolder off of the root 
system drive very frustrating. Makes me
crazy actually. While it definitely helps avoid the pitfalls of better secured 
operating system installs, it clutters up
the drive I want clean and optimized. If they need the root, they can have the 
D or F partition. Hardcoded to C:\ is
candidate for non-install.

Rick
White Light Computing, Inc.

www.whitelightcomputing.com
www.swfox.net
www.rickschummer.com



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to