On 03/22/2011 07:35 PM, Ricardo Araoz wrote: > El 22/03/11 09:51, lelandj escribió: >> I guess the vacuum created by the recent uprising will eventually be >> filled, but by who; what? President Obama, and his Administration, >> seem to be more about getting rid of Moammar Qaddafi, than about >> supporting a particular rebel. Often what emerges form this kind of >> chaos is the strongest, most ruthless group will take over the country, >> which might be Oaddafi, after all is said and done. >> >> BTW, President Obama is not a neocon, but he does seems to want Qaddafi >> out and to show support for a democratic Libya. He also want to avoid >> the atrocities. I think even a hard line, card carrying neocon would >> take pause before diving into this Libyan mess. >> >> There is no standardized definition of Neoconservatism, but President >> Obama is diametrically opposite to the general meaning of the term. > BTW, we kind of agree on this. > Though I should point out that what emerges is none of our business. Let > the Libyans determine that.
I agree. Regards, LelandJ > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
