On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Alan Bourke <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Op 8-apr.-2011 16:16 schreef "John Weller" <[email protected]> het
>> volgende:
>> > Alan is Irish :-)
>
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:34 +0200, "Jean Laeremans"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Even worse
>
>
> Haha ain't that the truth.
>
> It's a customer who we're being extra-special-nice to, to ease their
> passage off their end-of-lifed FPW application and onto the VFP9
> successor to same. So I'll be re-doing the project in VFP9 fairly soon.
> Interesting to be able to code in FPW in such a way as to make it as
> easy as possible to convert later.
---------------

Yesterday had a conversation with the COO who devises all projects for
us in Dev to do.

His statement is that we will not RE-DO any existing application in a
newer version ever.  If business needs overwhelm an existing app then
that app will be retooled to fit the business as it is today looking
forward.  The longer story is small tiny apps that did it all and if
they needed a tweak they called an add on app.  Some of our users have
upwards of 8 - 12 in house apps running at the same time.

This is VB6 and some VS2005.  There is one replacement app in VS2010
for one group here.  That reduced 6 apps into a single replacement.
As other groups need to ad more or have rules change within their
groups will have similar replacements as well.



-- 
Stephen Russell

Unified Health Services
60 Germantown Court
Suite 220
Cordova, TN 38018

Telephone: 888.510.2667

901.246-0159 cell

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to