Alan Bourke wrote: Hi Alan,
Don't worry - I noticed it after an off-list name-calling and reposted it with the proper tag. Thus, it gets to be the top thread of the day so far, LOL. > Irish contributor chides other contributor on lack of [OT] tag. :) > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:27 -0400, "Pete Theisen" > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Everybody, >> >> What are the chances of this? So unlikely I checked it on snopes: True. >> >> http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=32454 -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
