President Obama has been responsible in his approach, and is taking 
responsibility.  The deficit had been building for decades along with an 
ever growing US government debt ceiling.  President Obama ran on a 
platform of fiscal responsibility, but had to postpone dealing with that 
problem to conform an economy that was very, very sick and getting worse 
by the minute.

His administration decided to adapt a policy of stimulating the economy 
for a couple of 2 or 3 years, and then confront the USA national debt.

The policy of stimulating the economy, and coming to the rescue of 
failing financial institutions and other major industries in serious 
financial trouble, or bankrupt, is working.  The economy is beginning to 
normalize, (eg returning to a pre-recessionary state), so President 
Obama policy is going exactly as planed and is right on schedule.

Regards,

LelandJ


On 04/24/2011 04:09 AM, Michael Madigan wrote:
> At what point does this slug take responsibility?  It's already been 27 
> months?  Maybe he needs a few more rounds of golf and a few more vacations to 
> get into the swing of things.
>
> --- On Sun, 4/24/11, Geoff<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
>> From: Geoff<[email protected]>
>> Subject: RE: [OT] Obama's America
>> To: "'ProFox Email List'"<[email protected]>
>> Date: Sunday, April 24, 2011, 4:54 AM
>> Because he didn’t inherit an
>> economy in free-fall or the debt or the unemployment or the
>> foreclosures right? But he did inherit Iraq and Afghanistan
>> while Libya is little more than a few missile launches.
>>
>> Do u remember the economy as Bush left? The one where the
>> biggest fear was DEPRESSION? A housing segment that had
>> already collapsed. Financial sector in ruins and
>> unemployment rising massively?
>>
>> I know perspective isn’t your strong suit but do u even
>> ACKNOWLEDGE that the economy that Bush left was in tatters?
>>
>>
>> Geoff Flight
>> Managing Director
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of Michael Madigan
>> Sent: Sunday, 24 April 2011 6:18 PM
>> To: ProFox Email List
>> Subject: RE: [OT] Obama's America
>>
>> I only notice the 9% unemployment because he's Black
>> I only notice the 6% inflation because he's Black
>> I only notice the $4.00 gas prices because he's Black
>> I only notice the record foreclosures because he's Black
>> I only notice the invasion of Libya because he's Black
>> I only notice the 1.6 trillion-dollar deficit because he's
>> Black
>> I only notice the 14 trillion-dollar debt because he's
>> Black
>> I only notice the dollar falling to record lows because
>> he's Black
>> I only notice the skyrocketing food prices because he's
>> Black
>>
>> --- On Sun, 4/24/11, Geoff<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Geoff<[email protected]>
>>> Subject: RE: [OT] Obama's America
>>> To: "'ProFox Email List'"<[email protected]>
>>> Date: Sunday, April 24, 2011, 4:36 AM
>>> Isn’t it about time for you to show
>>> the Stock market figures since Obama was
>>> elected? You did that for a while - until they went
>> up.
>>> What about the
>>> financial mess? But you don’t now because it is
>> better
>>> than it was under
>>> Bush who was looking at the DEPRESSIOn that Obama
>> managed
>>> to avert.
>>>
>>> But let's face it. In you world, the real problem is
>> he is
>>> BLACK. That's all
>>> it has ever really been about.
>>>
>>> Geoff Flight
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> On Behalf
>>> Of Michael Madigan
>>> Sent: Sunday, 24 April 2011 6:02 PM
>>> To: ProFox Email List
>>> Subject: RE: [OT] Obama's America
>>>
>>> You an Leland are battling it out for most delusional
>>> twit.   I wonder who's
>>> going to win?
>>>
>>> --- On Sun, 4/24/11, Geoff<[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Geoff<[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: RE: [OT] Obama's America
>>>> To: "'ProFox Email List'"<[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Sunday, April 24, 2011, 2:35 AM
>>>> In madagain's case it would be
>>>> because he is black. In most others is
>>>> because their history doesn't look back past 2
>> years.
>>>> America is in trouble
>>>> yet in 2008 it was heading into the abyss. To
>> people
>>> with
>>>> perspective this
>>>> is called BETTER.
>>>>
>>>> Geoff Flight
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> On Behalf
>>>> Of lelandj
>>>> Sent: Sunday, 24 April 2011 1:43 PM
>>>> To: ProFox Email List
>>>> Subject: Re: [OT] Obama's America
>>>>
>>>> Can you tell me in specific language exactly why
>> you
>>> think
>>>> the Obama
>>>> Presidency is the worst in our history?  I
>> keep
>>>> hearing that alot, but
>>>> never hear anything specific, so its hard to
>> filter
>>> out the
>>>> bias and
>>>> prejudice to get at the truth.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> LelandJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 04/23/2011 10:32 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
>>>>> In your dreams.  If anybody's been
>> paying
>>>> attention,  Obama's GOT to be
>>>> the
>>>>> worst we've ever had to endure.  Stop
>> drinking
>>>> the Koolaid- it's more than
>>>>> apparent.  We may not survive as a
>> nation until
>>>> 2012, and if he's
>>>>> re-elected, GAME OVER.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fred
>>>>>
>>>>> 1 at 3:00 PM, lelandj<[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Historians will be the judge of that,
>> not
>>>> partisan, political
>>>>>> propagandist.  LOL  Personally
>> I feel
>>>> history will judge the Obama
>>>>>> Presidency kindly; perhaps even
>> reverently.
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LelandJ
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts
>> ---
>>>>> multipart/alternative
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to