On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Rafael Copquin <[email protected]> wrote:
> You're not being naïve at all. Maybe I did not express myself correctly.
>
> The way my system works is this:
>
> Whenever a user, previously authorized by his/her password to examine
> the documents, wants to read a doc, xls, pdf file,  it is the program
> that pulls the requested file and shows it in the screen for the user to
> read.
>
> I then use the _environment.vcx that ships with VFP to shell execute the
> document. It can be read, modified, saved, printed, emailed, etc. This
> are precisely the possibilities I want to prevent the users to have.
>
> I just want them to read, and only read the Word, Excel or PDF document.
> No modifying, printing, saving, emailing...... Of course if they use
> their cell phone to take a picture of the screen, well, then I'm
> screwed, but other than that.....
>
> Am I clear now?
-------------

It becomes a RIGHTS issue correct?   Either you can view / edit those
secret documents or you cannot.

That being said SQL Server is great at thwarting users because of
insufficient rights.  Why not set up two users for the database one
with rights to those tables and the other user without the rights.
Just as a guess your connection to the db for all of our VFP work is
with a user that has sysadmin rights.  Something that scares the crap
out of dba.

-- 
Stephen Russell

Unified Health Services
60 Germantown Court
Suite 220
Cordova, TN 38018

Telephone: 888.510.2667

901.246-0159 cell

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to