On 6/18/2011 6:16 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Did you actually read the article?
Yes, I did. Actually, I had read it before, and several others on the same topic. Sorry if I sounded like I was bypassing it; what I was trying to do was expand on the problem that caused the request for a non-religious "chaplain" in the first place. Maybe if the military had real counselors, like a high school, that wouldn't be necessary. But tradition has given us a system where counseling is assumed to be religious in nature, and provided by "chaplains", and thus only marginally available to those with no religion. Dan _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
