That sounds exciting. I have not worked in assembler in many years. Is it 
possible to move code to different hardware
with a different instruction set and, of course, a different assembler? The 
last time I worked in assembler was on an
Intel 8080. I think it only took 3 months to write a tape device driver. For a 
bookkeeping application like we work on
now, it would probably take about 5 thousand years to write in assembler or 
about 400,000 years in machine code. But you
could split that time between a few thousand developers if you had enough 
money. Sounds like somthing the government
would be interested in doing.

Reminds of the present Obama healthcare fiasco with the 'MU' EHR requirements. 
The AMA just woke up and brought up the
issue of a doctor working in several different institutions and all of them 
have different software with a different
user interface. Obviously no one who worked on that law bothered to talk to the 
people who would be required to use it.
After looking at some of the 'certified' EHR packages out there, I have not 
seen any that are usable, much less having
to learn how to use several. Probably all of them will patent their user 
interface so it will not be possible to have
anything 'common'


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "MB Software Solutions,LLC" <[email protected]>
To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [NF] Questions on migrating VFP app


On 6/22/2011 4:21 PM, John Harvey wrote:
> I would go with assembler. This project would last forever!


Cha-CHING!  $$$$$  :-)

-- 
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
http://twitter.com/mbabcock16

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/026701cc3121$2c86df20$7a00a8c0@w2k3s02
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to