On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Tracy Pearson <[email protected]>wrote:
> Fred Taylor wrote on 2011-06-24: > > Tracy, > > > > SMB2 on Vista/7 vs SMB on XP? > > > > Fred > > > > Fred, > > That is one of the things we point out, as well as a couple others: > Anti-Virus and desktop search tools exclusion settings. > On demand backup tools > > A few times it's been because the authentication of UNC paths instead of a > mapped drive that we've seen major slow downs. > > Tracy Pearson > PowerChurch Software > > > Tracy, It was definitely a server issue for us, not an AV one. We only noticed it when the development moved to a new server (new name) and the old one went offline. All the existing .EXE's suddenly started really slow, and the problem went away when they were recompiled on the new server. The compiled EXE's were never actually run from the development server, they were copied to a production server and ran from there. We even confirmed it by bringing the old development server back online and the older compiled .EXE's loaded fast again. Take the old developer server back offline and they started slowly. Fred --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
