OK - this is WEIRD! I switched the code back to using the Single line - and commented out the alternate 4 lines - and now it works without a problem!
Oh well - I can't explain - but, it works - and no need to bother with it anymore. So - nothing more to see here folks - you can move along... :-) -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 1:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: A Strange Boolean Problem... Nope - it's the ProFox list here that wraps the lines - and in the code it was all in one line - no need for ; -K- -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Covill Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 1:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: A Strange Boolean Problem... On 10/03/12 09:29, Kurt Wendt wrote: > But, a similarly structure command like this does NOT work: > > STORE .F. TO xPT_Req_YN, xTop_Act_YN, xCnf_Act_YN, > xAppt_Md_YN > Works fine for me, Kurt. I cut/pasted your code into a dummy prg and all four private variables were created and set to .F. I did have to put a ';' at the end of the first line, though! ?? Dan [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140e260...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
