Speaking of snakes, good morning Ricardo.
________________________________ From: Ricardo Aráoz <[email protected]> To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 7:26 AM Subject: Re: [OT] Absent father families of snakes El 04/10/12 01:06, Nicholas Geti escribió: > There is one point that should be made clear. Snakes are not born, they are > hatched. In other words snakes form inside of an egg and are not attached by > an umbilical cord to the mother. That egg may be carried inside the mother > but the offspring are still hatched. > > I think this point may have a bearing on whether a male is needed to > fertilize the egg. In higher order mammals reproduction is much more > complicated and we may not find virgin births. Unless a "Holy Spirit" commits adultery with Joe's wife. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
