ShareO is considerably less expensive and we are only talking about two
users. So it sounds like it would work.
Thanks Paul & Dave,
Jeff
---------------
Jeff Johnson
[email protected]
(623) 582-0323
www.san-dc.com
On 10/03/2012 11:37 PM, Dave Crozier wrote:
One of my customers tried Share0 about 12 months back and ran it successfully
with 3 clients but subsequently moved over to Kerio as Paul identified and
found it worked better with what are now 16 users connected.
Personally I used to use Kerio when it was just a Pop3 mailserver and never had
any issues but that was about 10 years ago.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnson
Sent: 03 October 2012 23:00
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NF] Outlook Synchronization
Has anyone had any success with having two users access Outlook on a server
without Exchange? I have seen a couple of products. ShareO looks like the
best feature wise, but no way of knowing how good it is.
TIA
--
Jeff
---------------
Jeff Johnson
[email protected]
(623) 582-0323
www.san-dc.com
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
