Show me where congress approved of it.
Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Oct 9, 2012, at 2:14 PM, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll revise your statement a little by saying: Congress approved Obamacare > only after a bitter compromise, which substantially weakened it in my opinion. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > On 10/09/2012 04:03 PM, Michael Oke wrote: >> Congress approved of obamacare? Revisionist history perhaps? >> >> >> Michael Oke, II >> 661-349-6221 >> >> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated >> recipient. >> >> On Oct 9, 2012, at 1:58 PM, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 10/09/2012 03:29 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: >>>> It's not "Universal Healthcare" however >>> It's as close to Universal as congress would allow. Eventually it will >>> morph into a Universal plan, if president Obama survives another term. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> LelandJ >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: lelandj <[email protected]> >>>> To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2012 4:29 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [OT] Truth About Jobs >>>> >>>> I'm sure you think Governor Romney's health care plan for Massachusetts >>>> was great. Right? Obamacare is essentially the same thing as >>>> Romneycare, but check the equation below: >>>> >>>> Obamacare = Romneycare >>>> >>>> But >>>> >>>> You think Obamacare is bad and Romenycare is great. LOL I would say >>>> there is a great deal of subjective feelings distorting your >>>> arithmetic. LOL >>>> >>>> Also, if I examined by comparison the various plans of other developed >>>> countries around the world including Obamacare, I expect I would find a >>>> great deal of similarity in all other them. >>>> >>>> You think Obamacare is bad; because, it has been so heavily >>>> propagandized as bad by the Republican party. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> LelandJ >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/09/2012 03:04 PM, Michael Oke wrote: >>>>> But that isn't what obamacare is. I realize that you have no clue about >>>>> that but it doesn't change the facts. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Michael Oke, II >>>>> 661-349-6221 >>>>> >>>>> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated >>>>> recipient. >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 9, 2012, at 12:56 PM, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 10/09/2012 02:12 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:35 AM, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After 50 year of struggle, the USA finally has a Universal Health Care >>>>>>>> program >>>>>>> -------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can't see the quality of government being a good thing for running >>>>>>> the national health care system. They run the TSA and that is an >>>>>>> abomination. Please tell me any other operation that is RECENT in >>>>>>> history that could be considered well run. The National Parks system >>>>>>> was wet over a hundred years ago, I want recent startups only. >>>>>> People around the world in country and country are enjoying the benefits >>>>>> of Universal Health Care. It works for them. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/06/heres-a-map-of-the-countries-that-provide-universal-health-care-americas-still-not-on-it/259153/ >>>>>> >>>>>> or >>>>>> >>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/6opom2n >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Improved USA international relations badly damaged by the Bush era >>>>>>>> Neoconservative foreign policies >>>>>>> -------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I like the one liner jokes as well. Yeap. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He has proposed many measure to reduce the deficit and bring fiscally >>>>>>>> responsible back into government, but has been blackballed by the >>>>>>>> extreme >>>>>>>> right wing of the Republican party, that refuses to pass anything >>>>>>>> President >>>>>>>> Obama manages to bring to the floors of congress. >>>>>>> --------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Has done a terrible job at breaking that wall. I consider this a >>>>>>> failure outright to NOT WORK TOGETHER. >>>>>> The extreme right wing of the Republican party specifically stated their >>>>>> number one priority was to make president Obama a one term President. >>>>>> These extremist have intentionally worked against President Obama's, and >>>>>> the American people, stonewalling legislation aimed at improving the >>>>>> economy and reducing the deficit. These extremist have used pretext >>>>>> after pretext to justify their positions for not supporting legislation >>>>>> to help the economy, a thus the American people. These extremist wanted >>>>>> a bad economy come election day; because, a soft economy would help them >>>>>> win the elections. >>>>>> >>>>>> An analogy might be helpful. It's like tying both arms and one leg >>>>>> behind a sprinter back, and then asking the sprinter to run a hundred >>>>>> meter race. When the sprinter post a poor time, he can then be >>>>>> criticized for being slow. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>>>> He has acted responsibly in exercising his executive powers on any >>>>>>>> number of >>>>>>>> important issues including immigration >>>>>>> --------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Generates an Executive order when he cannot get his way. >>>>>> With a Republican control House of Representative that kept say yes to >>>>>> their most extreme element, (eg The Tea Party Republican), there was no >>>>>> other way. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> LelandJ [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
