Mike, The big advantage as I see it in a .prg class is that you can see ALL the code together in one place as opposed to snippets!
Dave -----Original Message----- From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: 15 October 2012 16:16 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: No session classes in a VCX? On 10/15/2012 11:11 AM, Tracy Pearson wrote: > MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote on 2012-10-15: >> I was refactoring some code to make it (hopefully) easier for others to >> maintain. I like the PRG-based dataobj classes but I know others like >> VCX classes instead. > > Mike, > > The PRG version works better for source control and DIFFs. Otherwise, > it works with converted to text versions. Yeah, that's another reason I like it much better. Like I said, I was doing this for others. But...on 2nd thought...maybe I'll keep it PRG. :-) I do recall Bo Durban saying there was a slight improvement on using the PRG class for something he worked on long ago (his Moxie reporting tool?) but perhaps the speed difference in today's VFP is negligible. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
