OK I did the archive search - what I was referring to is:
an article by Chuck Urwiler: "Convert FoxPro 2.x Apps to Visual
FoxPro Gradually". This appeared in the January 1998 edition of
FoxPro Advisor
There may be archives available online.
Can't remember the exact problems with pageframes (nesting?) but I remember
having to extract all the individual pages
AndyD 8-)#
On 24/10/2012 10:48, [email protected] wrote:
No kidding huh? What is up with the pageframes?.... 8-)
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message-----
From: AndyHC <[email protected]>
Sender: "ProFox" <[email protected]>Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:48:06
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: FoxPro for Windows: 64-bit Machines
Try searching the archives for an article on 'converting to VFP
gradually' - and watch out for those pageframes!
AndyD 8-)#
On 23/10/2012 20:02, Desmond Lloyd wrote:
That's the general feeling I am getting.... Go to VFP. Especially
with those odd issues. A conversion has pretty much been needed now
for several years...
Regards,
Desmond
<snip>
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
