No that's not it because when I reindexed everything was fine. It's almost like VFP 9.0 is rejecting the index and just showing no results, but the FPW 2.6 works fine.
I suppose I can just create a cursor instead of a relation to the main file, but it works 99% of the time like this. This error occurred about 2 months ago. ________________________________ From: Dave Crozier <[email protected]> To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 3:22 AM Subject: RE: Strange behavior using between Foxpro 2.6 and VFP 9.0 Michael, By any chance are there deleted records at the top of the table and/or do you use filtered indexes or have the child records of a relationship in the grid. There is a known problem with this that I reported when 9 and 7 came out. It is to do with the refresh not kicking in when it should and you solve it by putting a grid on the form which has recordsource of the "child table" but is invisible (visible = .f.). This forces the display grid to refresh itself. Dave -----Original Message----- From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 24 October 2012 15:28 To: Pro Fox Email List Subject: Strange behavior using between Foxpro 2.6 and VFP 9.0 We have 2 programs in production, 1 is a Foxpro 2.6 program and one is a VFP 9.0 program. They are basically identical. Today, the main screen on the VFP 9.0 is not showing payments in the grid. The 2.5 is showing payments in a browse screen. I saw this happen before and reindexing the payment file fixed things, the only problem is there are no errors and one system seems to using the index file fine, and the other isn't. Have you seen this before? --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept[excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
