Me too.

I originally had doublequotes around "beginner", but decided
"self-identified" made the point well enough.

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Roger Hui <rogerhui.can...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> For a self-identified beginner -- that's quite smart.
>
> I suspect this "beginner" has multiple advanced degrees in math, comp.
> sci., etc.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Ian Clark <earthspo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> For a self-identified beginner -- that's quite smart.
>>
>> (;"_1) indeed! You've been reading the J Dictionary. Very carefully.
>>
>> > if you like "pipelining" your verbs.
>>
>> Isn't that what J's all about?
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Peter B. Kessler
>> <peter.b.kess...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> > I'm still at the stage where I have to read the dictionary entry for
>> most of
>> > the verbs, so I'm not even in the slow lane yet.  Looking at Stitch
>> (dyadic
>> > ,.)[1] I was reminded of the explanation of u"_1, which suggested using
>> Link
>> > (dyadic ;)[2]
>> >
>> >            g =:  }. @ (; @ (;"_1))
>> >
>> >            ' ' g t
>> >         alpha bravo chuck
>> >            LF g t
>> >         alpha
>> >         bravo
>> >         chuck
>> >
>> > if you like "pipelining" your verbs.  (The outer set of parens aren't
>> needed
>> > in  g  , but that's a subtly different pipeline.)
>> >
>> >                         ... peter
>> >
>> > [1] http://www.jsoftware.com/docs/help701/dictionary/d321.htm
>> > [2] http://www.jsoftware.com/docs/help701/dictionary/d330.htm
>> >
>> >
>> > Linda Alvord wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In the slow lane, here's a version without  @  or  &.  or even  inv .
>> >>
>> >>    t=: 'alpha' ; 'bravo' ; 'chuck'
>> >>       }.@((<' ') ;@,. ]) t
>> >> alpha bravo chuck
>> >>    }: ; t,&.> ' '
>> >> alpha bravo chuck
>> >>    }.(<' ')([:;,.) t
>> >> alpha bravo chuck
>> >>
>> >> Linda
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>> >> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Linda
>> Alvord
>> >> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 4:07 PM
>> >> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
>> >> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Flattening a list containing boxed elements
>> >>
>> >> Thanks, After I sent the message it rankled me that it might be a
>> problem
>> >> of rank.
>> >>
>> >> Linda
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>> >> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Dan Bron
>> >> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 12:35 PM
>> >> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
>> >> Cc: <programm...@jsoftware.com>
>> >> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Flattening a list containing boxed elements
>> >>
>> >> Rank.  All definitions in the DoJ are subject to considerations of rank,
>> >> though this often -forgive the pun- tacit.
>> >>       NB.                vi (v x) u (v y)
>> >>       glue  =: dyad def '<  (> x) , (> y)'
>> >>                     NB.  Rank zero here is key
>> >>       ; z glue"0 ' '     alpha bravo chuck
>> >>
>> >> -Dan
>> >>
>> >> Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.
>> >>
>> >> On Sep 7, 2012, at 11:22 AM, "Linda Alvord" <lindaalv...@verizon.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Now what am I missing?
>> >>>  ; z ,&.> ' ' alpha bravo chuck
>> >>>
>> >>>   NB.  x u&.v y ↔ vi (v x) u (v y)
>> >>>
>> >>>   ;<(>z),>' '
>> >>> alpha
>> >>> bravo
>> >>> chuck
>> >>>
>> >>> Linda
>> >>>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com [mailto:programming-
>> >>> boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Linda Alvord
>> >>> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 11:00 AM
>> >>> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
>> >>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Flattening a list containing boxed elements
>> >>>
>> >>> Chuck caused grief!
>> >>>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>> >>> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Dan
>> Bron
>> >>> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 9:24 AM
>> >>> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
>> >>> Cc: <programm...@jsoftware.com>
>> >>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Flattening a list containing boxed elements
>> >>>
>> >>> There are more issues than that.  For example, try it with "chuck"
>> >>> instead of "charlie".
>> >>>
>> >>> Also, since > is a scalar verb, the "0 is superfluous. Also, the ,' '
>> >>> appends spaces not to the individual words, but to the entire array, so
>> >>> that they all end up trailing, instead of interspersed as desired (the
>> >>> spaces which separate the words in Linda's final result are an
>> >>> [undependable] side-effect of >, and the experiment suggested above
>> may hint
>> >>> at their origin).
>> >>>
>> >>> But, like newcomer to a foreign tongue, Linda has certainly made
>> herself
>> >>> understood, and the idea is spot on, even if the words aren't exact.
>> >>> Certainly we do want to:
>> >>>
>> >>>> get inside
>> >>>
>> >>> "0 each box
>> >>> ,' ' append a space
>> >>> , and string the whole thing together.
>> >>>
>> >>> A native speaker might have said ; z ,&.>  ' '  (and a fastidious
>> speaker
>> >>> would prepend a }: ).
>> >>>
>> >>> -Dan
>> >>>
>> >>> Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sep 7, 2012, at 8:02 AM, "R.E. Boss" <r.e.b...@planet.nl> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>  z=: 'alpha' ; 'bravo' ; 'charlie'
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     ' '=,(>"0 z),' '
>> >>>> 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     ' '=;:^:_1 z
>> >>>> 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> R.E. Boss
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> >>>>> Van: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>> >>>
>> >>> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] Namens Linda Alvord
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Verzonden: vrijdag 7 september 2012 12:50
>> >>>>> Aan: 'Programming forum'
>> >>>>> Onderwerp: Re: [Jprogramming] Flattening a list containing boxed
>> >>>>> elements
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Did I miss this somewhere?  An alternative without inv.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>  ,(>"0 z),' '
>> >>>>> alpha  bravo  charlie
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Linda
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> - For information about J forums see
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >>>
>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >>>
>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >>>
>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >>
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >>
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >>
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to